Home » Technology » Why Sub-6GHz 5G is more important than mmWave

Why Sub-6GHz 5G is more important than mmWave

< type="image/webp"/>Green 5G logo taken at MWC 2019

Similar to previous cellular generations, the 5G spectrum is divided into multiple frequency bands. Although this time around, 5G aims to use vastly more spectrum than ever before. On the one extreme, we have millimeter waves (often referred to as mmWave) and, on the other, frequencies that lie in the sub-6GHz spectrum. Both are key parts of 5G deployments, yet offer vastly different benefits and drawbacks.

In the past, you really had little choice when picking 4G capabilities between phones. Even today, inexpensive smartphones offer comparative LTE speeds as a more premium device, everything else being equal. With 5G however, we now have two distinct frequency ranges that work very differently from one another.

Not all devices support mmWave 5G frequencies and, by extension, they can’t all reach the same speeds either. Therefore, you need to be a bit more thoughtful about all of this while shopping for a 5G-capable device. Let’s take a quick look at the difference between mmWave and sub-6GHz 5G technologies. We’ll also discuss whether or not you should prioritize mmWave connectivity for your next smartphone.

See also: The best 5G smartphones on sale right now

mmWave vs. sub-6GHz 5G: What’s the difference?

< type="image/webp"/>LG V50 5G logo closeup

As the name suggests, mmWave represents electromagnetic waves that have extremely short, millimeter wavelengths. The shorter the wavelength, the higher the frequency. So in other words, mmWave signals have high frequencies, to the tune of 28 to 100GHz. Contrast that range to 4G LTE or even lower band 5G, and you’ll find that most existing frequency bands today barely exceed 5GHz.

There’s an important reason for all of this. Higher frequency signals are capable of carrying more data, which directly translates to faster network speeds. For some context, mmWave 5G devices can offer maximum speeds of around 4-5Gbps, although consumer speeds are often lower. Still, mmWave can be faster than most wired fiber broadband connections. By comparison, the best sub-6GHz connections can hit a few hundred Mbps, although tens of Mbps is often more realistic.

mmWave 5G promises impressive data speeds, well in excess of most broadband connections.

However, the downside of mmWave signals is that they’re significantly more susceptible to losses when passing through obstacles. In reality, you might only see a few hundred megabits per second, unless you have a direct line of sight with a mmWave cell tower. This is where lower frequency 5G bands come in. These lie in the range of 1 to 6GHz and are often referred to as sub-6GHz 5G

< type="image/webp"/>5G spectrum and technologies, mmWave, sub-6GHz, and LTE

Sub-6GHz 5G bands occupy similar frequency ranges as previous generations, so they’re not as much of a departure as mmWave 5G. While the frequencies themselves only offer a small improvement in terms of speed over LTE, more spectrum with sub-6GHz means more bandwidth and faster user speeds. In addition, these lower frequency signals retain the ability to better penetrate obstacles.

The n78 band — at 3.5GHz — is one of the most popular 5G frequencies in use worldwide. Admittedly, you won’t get chart-topping speeds because it falls in the sub-6GHz spectrum. However, it will offer a much more consistent experience that doesn’t depend on your phone’s exact location and orientation. Similarly, the n41 band is also pretty popular because it’s the same 2.5GHz frequency that carriers have used for 4G and 3G deployments in the past. These popular bands are quickly forming the backbone of global 5G networks.

See also: The state of 5G: Hype versus reality two years later

What’s the problem with mmWave 5G?

< type="image/webp"/>5G signal on Galaxy Note 8

The race to reach higher frequencies has already been heating up in other wireless industries for several years now. Yet, time and time again, we’ve found that higher frequencies aren’t universally better.

Take Wi-Fi, for example. Most routers today are capable of broadcasting at both 2.4GHz and 5GHz. As we’d expect, the former is great for range. 5GHz signals accomplish significantly higher transfer speeds but cannot penetrate walls as easily. Your devices typically switch between the two bands automatically, depending on the signal strength and other factors.

Read more: The definitive guide to Wi-Fi standards

60GHz Wi-Fi already demonstrated that higher frequencies are not always practical in the real world.

While the Wi-Fi industry has experimented with higher frequencies like 60GHz, it wasn’t found to be practical outside of niche use-cases. With the latest Wi-Fi 6E standard operating in the 6GHz band, we’ve realized that incremental increases are better than giant leaps at the cost of practicality.

All of this isn’t entirely unlike mmWave in the cellular industry, which promises to deliver unprecedented speeds that we’ve all subtly associated with 5G by now. However, for anyone living a reasonable distance away from a mobile tower, there’s little chance that mmWave signals will reach them due to the heightened probability of transmission loss.

Sub-6GHz 5G is essential for blanket coverage and bandwidth, while mmWave offers higher speeds over shorter distances.

As such, mmWave deployments are limited to short distances, such as a few streets, and areas that benefit most from extreme high bandwidth, such as stadiums and city centers. mmWave requires multiple tower placements to cover a wider area, which isn’t cheap. Sub-6GHz, by comparison, offers far better blanket coverage, and therefore forms the essential backbone for improving 5G network speeds to most consumers.

Where is mmWave and sub-6GHz 5G available?

< type="image/webp"/>A 5G network tower

Delivering mmWave signals far and wide will require operators to build out more extensive and denser infrastructure than ever before. As you probably already know by now, that’s simply not a reality yet. Even setting aside the high costs, most people aren’t clamoring for faster 5G data transmission than their broadband connections.

Read more: Which US cities have 5G coverage today?

It may take years for such infrastructure to materialize outside of the largest cities in your country. Despite that, telecom operators in some countries like the US have been trying to push mmWave for years now. As we mentioned, sub-6GHz is a smaller step up from 4G LTE and offers broader coverage, making it the faster and more affordable option for carriers starting their 5G deployments.

Only a handful of countries have active deployments of mmWave 5G. Most carriers outside the US have opted for sub-6GHz only.

There are only a handful of countries that have active mmWave deployments at the moment. While the US, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and Singapore all have 5G networks, keep in mind that mmWave is usually only available in certain cities or neighborhoods. Sub-6GHz 5G, on the other hand, is much more widely available, both locally and globally.

Which phones skip mmWave 5G?

< type="image/webp"/>ZTE Axon 11 5G logo

If you consult spec sheets often, you’ll know that smartphone features regularly differ from one region to the next. This is true for 5G compatibility as well. The Pixel 6 Pro, for example, only includes mmWave 5G support in the US, Australia, and Japan. Other countries, including Canada and most of Europe, get a different model that is limited to sub-6GHz 5G.

The Google Pixel 6, on the other hand, is sold in two configurations in the US — an unlocked version with sub-6GHz 5G for $599 and the other with mmWave 5G for $699. The latter is offered through carriers such as Verizon and AT&T. This price bump can be attributed to mmWave implementations requiring specialized radio hardware and antennas.

Smartphone manufacturers usually include mmWave hardware and antennas in region and carrier-specific models.

In the US and other key mmWave markets, premium devices like the Galaxy S21 series and iPhone 13 almost always include support for mmWave 5G. But other markets may only sell a sub-6GHz model. As for lower-end devices, you may find carrier-specific models with mmWave support, but be prepared to pay extra.

Should you buy a sub-6GHz or mmWave 5G smartphone?

< type="image/webp"/>ATT 5G Logo on the back of a phone

Eric Zeman / Android Authority

Whether or not you should pay the price premium for mmWave depends on your use case and whether you live in a densely populated area that actually offers mmWave coverage. Concerts and sporting events, for example, are infamous for inducing network congestion in traditional cell phone networks. mmWave 5G could definitely help in these scenarios. Before you buy, be sure to consult your carrier’s 5G coverage map to make sure you will receive a 5G mmWave connection in your area.

Beyond just faster speeds, mmWave 5G has the potential to alleviate network congestion in densely packed areas like cities, sporting events, and concerts.

Outside of the aforementioned mmWave markets, though, most manufacturers have only adopted sub-6GHz bands for their 5G devices. Most of Europe, for example, has next to zero mmWave coverage at the moment. To that end, most smartphones available in the region will not feature support for higher frequencies anyway. It’s certainly not worth importing a mmWave handset for futureproofing either, as there’s no guarantee it will support future local mmWave carrier bands.

While many countries have held auctions for the mmWave spectrum of late, the actual rollout will likely still take several years. And in countries like India where telecom operators have yet to roll out any 5G infrastructure at all, it’s quite safe to assume that sub-6GHz networks will come online long before mmWave.

Regardless, though, outside of a handful of applications, sub-6GHz should serve most of us well enough for the foreseeable future.

Now that you’re up to speed on the differences between the different types of 5G deployments worldwide, consider checking out our comprehensive guide to 5G. It explores how the new standard differs from previous generations and discusses the technology’s real-world implications in the years to come.

Above article first published by . We curated and re-published.

Related Posts